The Gate on Martins Beach Road

Most beaches are famous for something you can see. Martins Beach is famous for something you cannot: a locked gate at the top of a private road, and the century of public custom it interrupted. To read the history of this small pair of coves south of Half Moon Bay is to watch a quiet handshake arrangement harden, over one purchase, into the most important beach-access fight in modern California.

A Hundred Years of an Open Gate

The land takes its name from Nicholas Martin, a local farmer who bought the property in the 1850s, when this stretch of the San Mateo coast was still being carved out of the old Mexican land grants. What made the place special was never just the sand; it was that the private owners chose to share it.

From the early 1900s the Deeney family owned the property and let the public onto the beach for free, charging only a modest fee to park. In the 1920s they leased the operation to the Watts family, who ran the Watts Inn — a building that still stands. The Deeneys took the beach back in the 1990s and kept the same bargain: open the gate, charge a few dollars to park, sell a little bait and a few snacks, and let the Bay Area come down to the water. Generations did. By 2014 there were still 45 leased cabins on the property, the residue of a place that had functioned, for practical purposes, as a public beach run by private hands.

That distinction — private land, public use, by permission — is the hinge the whole later story swings on. Nobody ever formally deeded the road to the public. The access was a custom, generous and consistent, but a custom nonetheless.

2008: The Property Changes Hands

In 2008 the venture capitalist Vinod Khosla, a co-founder of Sun Microsystems and one of Silicon Valley's best-known investors, bought the roughly 90-acre property that wraps around the beach — and, crucially, contains the only road down to it. He has consistently said he bought private land and never agreed to run a public beach.

Within about two years the practical reality changed completely. The gate on Martins Beach Road was locked. A billboard that had long advertised beach access was painted over. Security was posted. The single route the public had used for a century was simply closed, and because California law protects the wet sand but not necessarily the way to reach it, a locked gate on a private road was enough to put the whole beach out of reach.

The Coastal Act Argument

The legal counterattack, led by the Surfrider Foundation in 2014, was clever precisely because it sidestepped the hardest question. Surfrider did not have to prove the public owned the road. It argued instead that closing a gate the public had used for a hundred years was "development" under the California Coastal Act of 1976 — the landmark law guaranteeing public access to the state's shoreline — and that any such change requires a Coastal Development Permit from the California Coastal Commission. Khosla had never applied for one.

A San Mateo County court agreed and ordered the gate reopened while the litigation continued. Khosla's own case leaned on the Fifth Amendment: forcing him to admit the public, he argued, was a government taking of private property that demanded just compensation. He appealed the Coastal Act ruling upward, and in October 2018 the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear his petition, leaving the ruling against him standing. For coastal advocates it was a signal victory.

Why It Didn't End There

The honest complication is that the 2018 win was narrower than the headlines suggested. It concerned the permit process, not a permanent public right-of-way. On a separate theory, a 2019 appellate decision held that the former owners' long practice of admitting visitors had not, by itself, legally dedicated the road to permanent public use. At one stage Khosla floated selling a strip of land for public access for about 30 million dollars — close to what he had paid for the whole estate — a number widely treated as a refusal in the shape of an offer. In 2020 the California Coastal Commission and the State Lands Commission filed a fresh lawsuit to nail down permanent access, and that case has ground toward trial in the years since.

So the gate is still the story. Martins Beach is where California's grand promise — that its coast belongs to everyone — collided with a deed, a road, and a billionaire willing to litigate to the Supreme Court. The beach is a pretty, foggy, cold-water cove. Its importance is that it forced the state to prove the promise was real, and the fact that the case is not fully closed is the truest thing about it.

Back to the full Martins Beach guide.